It is likely that HSE will be discussed at the next session of the House of Commons Science and Technology Committee's enquiry on Space Policy on 21 February, at which the President of the RAS will give oral evidence ( the RAS's written evidence can be read here).
If you want to make additional comments please join the Forum discussion
'The RAS strongly endorses the scientific benefits of space missions, which have transformed our knowledge of the Earth, the solar system and the universe over the past 50 years.
The RAS holds to the view that the prime driver in selection of scientific space missions, within an inevitably limited budget, should be the quality of the science.
The RAS recognizes that there may be some scientific goals that can only be achieved within a human spaceflight programme (see the Report of the RAS Commission on The Scientific Case for Human Spaceflight). However these goals are likely to be feasible only within a greatly expanded scientific space programme.
The RAS also recognizes that the space programme is a powerful attractor of school-children and students towards STEM subjects, and that the space industry is an important sector of the UK economy. Educational, economic and technological arguments might support a UK involvement in human spaceflight. However this would require separate funding, additional to the science budget.'